The United States Postal Service has reversed its decision to ban inbound packages from China and Hong Kong, just one day after announcing the suspension.

The U.S. Postal Service said it would resume accepting parcels from China and Hong Kong, after temporarily suspending the service and sparking concerns about delivery disruptions.

The U.S. Postal Service on Tuesday suspended all incoming parcels from China and Hong Kong only to reverse the decision less than 24 hours later. No reason was given for the reversal of the decision.

The Postal Service's move to stop accepting packages had come in the wake of the Trump administration’s decision to impose a new round of 10% tariffs on all goods coming from China.

LOS ANGELES/LONDON, Feb 5 (Reuters) - The U.S. Postal Service said on Wednesday it would again accept parcels from China and Hong Kong, reversing a 12-hour suspension after President Donald Trump ...

The US Postal Service says it has suspended the acceptance of international parcels from China and Hong Kong until further notice.

USPS says it will accept packages from China and Hong Kong after temporary suspension The U.S. Postal Service on Wednesday halted an order to suspend incoming shipments from China that threatened ...

The U.S. Postal Service is reversing course a day after placing a ban on all inbound mail and packages from China and Hong Kong.

The U.S. Postal Service announced it would continue accepting packages from China and Hong Kong Wednesday, marking an abrupt reversal hours after a late Tuesday decision to temporarily suspend ...

The U.S. postal service is reversing course a day after it said it would not accept packages from China and Hong Kong. The ban came after the U.S. imposed an additional 10% tariff on Chinese goods.

The U.S. Postal Service will temporarily suspend accepting inbound parcels from China and Hong Kong Posts until further notice.

The U.S. Postal Service on Tuesday suspended all incoming parcels from China and Hong Kong only to reverse the decision less than 24 hours later. No reason was given for the reversal of the decision.